Are the days of the prompt engineer already over?
It was only a year or two ago that the role of prompt engineer was being touted as the next great career path. Thousands of job ads appeared. People the world over updated their LinkedIn profiles to highlight their prompt engineering skills. Online courses promised six-figure salaries for mastering the art of writing prompts in ChatGPT.
Fast forward a couple of years and the role is already on its way out.
What’s changed?
In the last few weeks firms like Microsoft and early AI adopter Klarna have highlighted the prompt engineer role’s impending death. Klarna has stopped hiring for the role, with one executive calling it a plaster which was useful in the early days, but not a long-term solution and now no longer necessary.
According to Jared Spataro, chief marketing officer of AI at Work at Microsoft, two years ago, everybody said, ‘Oh, I think prompt engineer is going to be the hot job. It’s not turning out to be true at all.’
In Microsoft’s most recent Work Trend Index survey, 31,000 workers across 31 countries were asked what new roles their companies were considering adding in the next 12 to 18 months. Prompt engineering was second from the bottom.
The rise of AI agents
This story isn’t just about job titles, it’s also about how fast the AI models are advancing in their capabilities and how AI is being used.
The models have become so good now at understanding what the user is trying to achieve that the previous need to use detailed prompt methodologies (e.g. Microsoft Goal, Context, Source, Expectation) are just not required.
Also, rather than asking people now to prompt a chatbot, businesses are starting to deploy AI agents that can carry out tasks, trigger processes and interact with other tools.
These agents can now do things like:
- Update CRM entries
- Generate and send reports
- Flag issues before they happen
- Coordinate between teams
This sort of stuff is already happening as AI is becoming embedded in day-to-day work, not just bolted on.
But agents aren’t all just easy plug-and-play bits of tech, they need ownership, and oversight. Which brings me to roles that matter now.
What businesses need from their people now
Prompt engineering was useful when no one knew what they were doing with large language models. But we’ve moved past that. What’s needed now is the ability to define the outcomes you want with AI and then be able to use the tools available like Copilot Studio to deliver them.
- That means hiring or training people who can:
- Understand your operations and where automation makes sense
- Build and test agent-led processes
- Connect systems, APIs, and data
- Put the right controls and checks in place
- Work across technical and business teams to deliver outcomes
Where to focus
If your current reality of AI in your business is still just focused on prompting, it’s time to take a step back and ask a few questions:
- Where are the repeatable tasks in our business?
- Which parts of our processes could be run by an agent?
- Who’s responsible for building the agents and making sure they deliver value, are safe, efficient and reliable?
The sooner your team moves from prompting to building, the better placed your business will be.
We are iwantmore.ai – an AI consulting firm that helps organisations to move beyond AI experiments and build tools that last. We help clients design, deploy and manage AI agents and train the teams who’ll run them.
If you’re ready to stop playing with prompts and start building with purpose, get in touch.
Interested in more content like this? Sign up to our Newsletter here.
Other AI articles you may be interested in:
Artificial intelligence is hungry for energy. Behind every chatbot, Copilot, or agent are servers burning a lot of power. As more UK companies adopt AI tools, it's worth paying attention to how much energy those tools use and what that means for your sustainability targets and reporting requirements.
AI is no longer a future trend — it’s a present-day advantage. While some businesses are building AI agents and transforming operations, others risk falling behind. This article looks at what’s driving the AI divide, why foundational knowledge matters, and how even small steps can unlock real competitive value. If you’re standing still, you’re already losing ground.
It was only a year or two ago that the role of prompt engineer was being touted as the next great career path. Thousands of job ads appeared. People the world over updated their LinkedIn profiles to highlight their prompt engineering skills. Fast forward a couple of years and the role is already on its way out.
The CTO is swamped with the day to day, the COO wants to see progress, the CFO wants to see hard ROI, and the CEO is reading headlines about competitors appointing ‘Chief AI Officers’ and is wondering why you don’t have one too. If this sounds familiar in your business, you might be wondering whether it’s time to create (or hire) a dedicated AI leader.
AI agents are the fancy buzzword of the day. Loads of hype, but also loads of potential. Despite the hype, over promise and noise, we are still witnessing the birth of a new business model: human-agent teams. Human employees that are building, managing and working alongside AI agents. Meet the agent boss.
We recently met a chief executive who despite his team asking for AI tools to help them work smarter, had decided that AI was not for him or his business. He even went as far as calling it ‘artificial unintelligence’. Despite this position, he admitted that competitors were taking market share. They were using AI to do a lot more with less. These were AI forward businesses. But what exactly is an AI forward business?
iwantmore.ai – The AI consulting firm that helps you build a smarter business
Wherever you are with your AI implementation initiatives, we have a range of stand-alone AI quick start services to help you fast track the transformative benefits of AI across your business.
